Dial:
The texture/color seems pretty spot on. Even the red triangle is an improvement over the Mark XVII.
表盘：质地和色泽都已经相当完美了，甚至红色的小三角都比之前的马克17有了很大改进（马克17已经比较完美了）
Flaws:
The lume is horribly applied. You can see the photos below where they're not evenly applied to the dial. Also it's hard to see from these photos but it has an off-white color compared to the hands and numeral markings (similar to the rep 3717)
缺点：
夜光刻度贴的太糟糕了，你可以看看下面的照片，刻度根本没有和表盘贴平。图片上可能看不出，但是实际中能看出夜光刻度是灰白色，和指针与数字的白色略有差别。
The font looks to be very similar to the gen but the only discrepancy is that the rep font is just a little bolder, as indicated by the "IWC SCHAFFHAUSEN" logo
字体和正品已经几乎一样了。但是仔细对比可以看出，仿表上的部分字体会比正品稍微粗一些。比如 "IWC SCHAFFHAUSEN"
The texture/color seems pretty spot on. Even the red triangle is an improvement over the Mark XVII.
表盘：质地和色泽都已经相当完美了，甚至红色的小三角都比之前的马克17有了很大改进（马克17已经比较完美了）
Flaws:
The lume is horribly applied. You can see the photos below where they're not evenly applied to the dial. Also it's hard to see from these photos but it has an off-white color compared to the hands and numeral markings (similar to the rep 3717)
缺点：
夜光刻度贴的太糟糕了，你可以看看下面的照片，刻度根本没有和表盘贴平。图片上可能看不出，但是实际中能看出夜光刻度是灰白色，和指针与数字的白色略有差别。
The font looks to be very similar to the gen but the only discrepancy is that the rep font is just a little bolder, as indicated by the "IWC SCHAFFHAUSEN" logo
字体和正品已经几乎一样了。但是仔细对比可以看出，仿表上的部分字体会比正品稍微粗一些。比如 "IWC SCHAFFHAUSEN"
